Re: SQL 2008 vs 2005 performance issue
- From: "Patrick Jackman" <pjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:18:45 -0700
Named Pipes is third in the order of network protocols. Shared Memory is
first, TCP/IP is second. Why would it be resorting to #3?
"Patrick Jackman" <pjackman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eEuZV1VOJHA.4092@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ran profiler on both machines.
The SQL Server 2005 machine is using TCP/IP.
The SQL Server 2008 machine is using Named Pipes.
Would that be the source of the speed difference? If so, where do I change
it?
I used all the default settings for the 2008 machine setup.
Patrick.
"Patrick Jackman" <pjackman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uhyatNMOJHA.1164@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I had SQL Server 2005 Standard installed on an older Toshiba Centrino laptop
with Win XP Pro SP3. It gave really great performance with an OLTP VBA
application.
I installed SQL Server 2008 Enterprise Eval on my new Toshiba Centrino Duo
with Win XP Pro SP3. With the same application it is 5 - 10 times slower
loading up a customer record from stored procedures.
Could I have set up 2008 incorrectly?
Connection string is:
ODBC;Driver={SQL Server};Server=(local);Database=ALIS;Trusted_Connection=Yes
Patrick
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Patrick Jackman
Vancouver, BC
604-874-5774
.
- References:
- SQL 2008 vs 2005 performance issue
- From: Patrick Jackman
- Re: SQL 2008 vs 2005 performance issue
- From: Patrick Jackman
- SQL 2008 vs 2005 performance issue
- Prev by Date: Re: SQL 2008 vs 2005 performance issue
- Next by Date: Re: RAM Usage on SQL Server
- Previous by thread: Re: SQL 2008 vs 2005 performance issue
- Next by thread: Re: SQL 2008 vs 2005 performance issue
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|