Re: Quick Question on SQL Server 2005 Express
- From: Ekrem Önsoy <ekrem@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 20:17:39 +0300
Why not? Your users even - if they'd be on the Moon- can query your SQL Server databases if you enable remote connection in your SQL Server Express Edition instance. Which is disabled by default. And of course you need an internet connection =)
You should open up SQL Server Surface Area Configuration tool of SQL Server to enable this protocol. Or you can perform this action from SQL Server Configuration Manager.
If your SQL Server instance is a Named Instance, then I suggest you to use a static port and let this port in your Firewall software\hardware. If it's a Default Instance then your port would be 1433 by default. And you'll configure these settings from Configuration Manager.
--
Ekrem Önsoy
"David Clifford" <someone@microso> wrote in message news:u%23lnfg42IHA.4500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thank you for that prompt reply Andrew.
It is what I suspected.
My main problem then is, if the SQL Database is located at a remote location..another building for example, then my client will NOT be able to run queries/change tables/etc using the Management Consule for a SQL Server 2005 instance on HIS local machine? Sorry for the rather basic question, but this is all sort of new to me
Regards
David
"Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:eeWb6H42IHA.2424@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxThat is correct. None of the versions of SQL Server support the database files residing on a networked share. But you don't attach the db from the server to a client anyway. The client should not be the sqls server service itself, it should be an application suing the client / server approach. The client talks to the server and hence the db thru the SQL Server service on the server and thus the client has no need to access the files directly.
--
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
Solid Quality Mentors
"David Clifford" <someone@microso> wrote in message news:%23xkWz432IHA.4988@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxHello All
A quick question. We are moving an Access database over to SQL Server 2005. No problems. The SQL Server database will be located on it's own server. To test the system, I installed SQL Server 2005 Express onto the server, got the database attached etc. No problems. I installed the same Express version onto a client computer so that the operator could use the database from his workstation, tried to attach the database, but the network drive was not listed in the file dropdown box..only the local C: and D: drives. My gut says that Express won't look at network drives, anyone care to comment?
Thank you
David.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Quick Question on SQL Server 2005 Express
- From: David Clifford
- Re: Quick Question on SQL Server 2005 Express
- References:
- Quick Question on SQL Server 2005 Express
- From: David Clifford
- Re: Quick Question on SQL Server 2005 Express
- From: Andrew J. Kelly
- Re: Quick Question on SQL Server 2005 Express
- From: David Clifford
- Quick Question on SQL Server 2005 Express
- Prev by Date: Re: Multi-Channel Raid VS SAN Storage
- Next by Date: Re: Quick Question on SQL Server 2005 Express
- Previous by thread: Re: Quick Question on SQL Server 2005 Express
- Next by thread: Re: Quick Question on SQL Server 2005 Express
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|