Re: changing db location on sql2000
- From: cj <cj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:03:39 -0500
Good thing? No. :) Choice is a good thing. The choice to do something stupid is a good thing. Because sometimes stupid makes perfect sense. :)
Following their logic I would think they wouldn't let me use a usb drive either but I can--just not this one as it shows up as a network drive even when plugged in via usb. Probably because it is so large.
While we're on the subject of bad ideas what's with MS Media Player not allowing me to have my library on a usb drive? I don't really want an answer to this just a similar situation that ticks me off.
Thanks for the answer.
Tibor Karaszi wrote:
SQL Server do not support having database files on a network share. That would adventure your database integrity, so it is a good thing..
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: changing db location on sql2000
- From: Charles Wang[MSFT]
- Re: changing db location on sql2000
- References:
- changing db location on sql2000
- From: cj
- Re: changing db location on sql2000
- From: Kevin3NF
- Re: changing db location on sql2000
- From: cj
- Re: changing db location on sql2000
- From: Kevin3NF
- Re: changing db location on sql2000
- From: cj
- changing db location on sql2000
- Prev by Date: Re: Sql server 2005 in vista ultimate
- Next by Date: Re: Max Lenght Of SQL Server 2000 Record
- Previous by thread: Re: changing db location on sql2000
- Next by thread: Re: changing db location on sql2000
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|