Re: Licensing for DB mirroring
- From: "bass_player [SBS-MVP]" <bass_player@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:56:57 +0800
Also, look out for the 30-day clause in the licensing which states that if
you failover to the mirror/standby instance (also applies for log shipping),
you have up to 30-days to keep it live without license and failback to the
original primary server within that span of time. Anything in excess of
30-days will require a license on the mirror/standby instance
"Ekrem Önsoy" <ekrem@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:9F0E02EB-FBFB-43FA-88E8-AEFF5E056BEC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
That's great! I didn't know that.
--
Ekrem Önsoy
"Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eYxdMOHNIHA.820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes Ben is 100% correct. As long as you don't use it for anything other
than a pure mirror it does not require a license similar to the way
clustering works.
--
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
Solid Quality Mentors
"Ben Nevarez" <BenNevarez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:49B3073A-96F1-4594-8EE7-8E8F5B7FD1C8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
Actually you do not need a license for the database server running the
mirror databases.
But if you use the database server for something else like creating a
database snapshot on the mirror database you will need a license.
See more details here:
SQL Server Pricing and Licensing
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/howtobuy/sqlserverlicensing.mspx
Hope this helps,
Ben Nevarez
Senior Database Administrator
AIG SunAmerica
"Ekrem Önsoy" wrote:
I've not seen\heard anything like you claim besides it does not make
sense.
Because it's not something like a SQL Server Failover Cluster' s
Active\Passive thing.
In database mirroring, second node' s (which holds the mirror database)
SQL
Server services must be running actively. So this means it's being used
actively. So it needs license.
In a two node cluster, if one SQL Server node is running and the second
node
is waiting in a standby mode for a failover then you do not need
another
license for the passive node. Because it does not work concurrently.
However, in Database Mirroring, the second SQL Server service should be
running on the second server itself to keep Database Mirroring up.
However, I searched Google and could not find a document about this
which
proves my opinion nor yours. You can ask to a local authorized software
license vendor.
--
Ekrem nsoy
"Fabio Gava" <esa_ud@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23PLemFANIHA.3940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
i've read that if you use the second instance of SQL Server 2005 as
DB
mirror only you don't need a second licence to run it. Is this
correct?
Eventually, to implement a 2-node DB mirror, what I need is:
2 Windows Server 2003 Std
1 SQL Server 2005 Std
Is this correct?
Many thanks
-f
.
- References:
- Licensing for DB mirroring
- From: Fabio Gava
- Re: Licensing for DB mirroring
- From: Ekrem Önsoy
- Re: Licensing for DB mirroring
- From: Ben Nevarez
- Re: Licensing for DB mirroring
- From: Andrew J. Kelly
- Re: Licensing for DB mirroring
- From: Ekrem Önsoy
- Licensing for DB mirroring
- Prev by Date: Re: Problem with install of MS SQL 2005 Standard on two node cluster
- Next by Date: Remote server not connecting
- Previous by thread: Re: Licensing for DB mirroring
- Next by thread: Re: Licensing for DB mirroring
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading