-- SQL 2005 memory (x64) --
- From: "Edmundo J. Davila" <edavila@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:41:41 -0600
Hi,
I have a windows 2003 server enterprise edition x64 w/SP2 and MS SQL Server 2005 x64 Enterprise Edition (1 instance).
I have a server IBM w/6GB in RAM. The task manager shows only 4GB of available memory but 6GB of physical memory. In the MS SQL Server properties / Memory / Maximum server memory it allows using only 2GB. I have not activated AWE options because I understand that 64 bits architecture doesn't need it to work with more than 4GB. Please see images attached.
What I want to do is to assign 4GB of RAM to SQL Server and 2GB for the OS. I'm not sure if it's the best configuration (5GB and 1GB probably is better). I have a RAID5 for the data files of the SQL Server and I've being thinking to use 4GB of cache in this RAID (I don't know if this is a good idea) for better performance.
I appreciate your comments regarding this matter.
Edmundo J. Davila
Attachment:
Memory.doc
Description: MS-Word document
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: -- SQL 2005 memory (x64) --
- From: Ekrem Önsoy
- Re: -- SQL 2005 memory (x64) --
- Prev by Date: Re: sql server 2005 does not recognize comments
- Next by Date: Re: sql server 2005 setup question
- Previous by thread: Re: sql server 2005 does not recognize comments
- Next by thread: Re: -- SQL 2005 memory (x64) --
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading