Re: 32 bit SQL vs 64 bit
- From: "Geoff N. Hiten" <SQLCraftsman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:08:50 -0400
The decision point varies for different users. A hardware refresh is a good time to consider 64-bit. Performance or scalability problems tracable to hardware limitations are also a good reason to consider an upgrade. The only reason I would see not to use 64-bit is if you need to access many non-SQL data sources. The supply of 64-bit ODBC drivers is a bit limited.
--
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior SQL Infrastructure Consultant
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Chris Wood" <anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:uyU$ZI5$HHA.536@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Geoff,
Is there anywhere that defines the moment that 64 bit should replace 32 bit rather than the hardware that you want to run on? We look like we should be moving up to 64 bit.
Thanks
Chris
Nice to meet you at PASS last week.
"Geoff N. Hiten" <SQLCraftsman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:eBVgWFv$HHA.5652@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxUnless you have a compelling reason such as external driver compatibility, I would definitely recommend 64-bit SQL for a highly scaled system.
--
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior SQL Infrastructure Consultant
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Gates" <gates@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:O$nSKpu$HHA.4496@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxWe are setting up a new beefy SQL database. I've got 32GB's of Ram. Everything I've been reading it looks like 64 bit is the way to go. Anyone have any thoughts on 32 vs 64?
Thanks,
Gates
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 32 bit SQL vs 64 bit
- From: Shailesh Khanal
- Re: 32 bit SQL vs 64 bit
- References:
- 32 bit SQL vs 64 bit
- From: Gates
- Re: 32 bit SQL vs 64 bit
- From: Geoff N. Hiten
- Re: 32 bit SQL vs 64 bit
- From: Chris Wood
- 32 bit SQL vs 64 bit
- Prev by Date: Re: Date Queries In Access to SQL Problems
- Next by Date: Re: Problem attaching Northwind traders sample database in SQL Server 2005
- Previous by thread: Re: 32 bit SQL vs 64 bit
- Next by thread: Re: 32 bit SQL vs 64 bit
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|