Re: Performance of single instance versus multiple instances
- From: "Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:26:05 -0400
Not really. Make sure that you have multiple files in Tempdb (1 per
processor with a minimum of 4) of equal size. If you have multiple drive
arrays you can possibly spread the files across the arrays. But if all the
arrays / channels are already overloaded there may not be too much you can
do file wise.
--
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Steve" <elstevester@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1183109161.480059.49880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 28 Jun, 22:10, "Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooos...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
If you have I/O issues with a single instance it won't get nay better
(most
likely worse) with multiple instances unless you give the other instances
their own HBA's and set of disks. But you can do that with the single
instance as well. If you can't read or write data fast enough from the
SAN
then SQL Server is not the place you need to fix, its the SAN. That is
assuming you have optimized your queries and such.
--
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Steve" <elsteves...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1183045613.078140.111410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi
I'm building a data warehouse server using clustered SQL 2005(x64). We
have a known disk I/O performance bottleneck in our current SAN, but
my new servers have reasonable CPU and RAM. My question is, would I
benefit from multiple instances, giving multiple tempdb workspaces, or
will the use of the same underlying disk infrastructure negate any
benefits of splitting the activity.
There are some administrative benefits of multiple instances, in that
I can group my databases by customer, but the best performance would
be my top priority - until I can get a bigger, faster all new-and-
improved SAN.
Thanks.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Thanks Andrew.
I agree in general - the SAN is due to be replaced in due course, and
more HBAs will be one of the priorities, but I have to build the
warehouse now. I was just wondering if there were any likely benefits,
eg, the multiple tempdbs, which the warehouse loading process hits
pretty hard.
.
- References:
- Performance of single instance versus multiple instances
- From: Steve
- Re: Performance of single instance versus multiple instances
- From: Andrew J. Kelly
- Re: Performance of single instance versus multiple instances
- From: Steve
- Performance of single instance versus multiple instances
- Prev by Date: Re: Performance of single instance versus multiple instances
- Next by Date: Re: sql server express on same workstation as ssl 2005
- Previous by thread: Re: Performance of single instance versus multiple instances
- Next by thread: SYSTEM account removing SQL service account from SQL groups
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|