Re: Exact use of Log file - why so big?
- From: "Doug Forster" <doug_ZAPTHIS_AT_ZAPTHIS_TONIQ_DOT_CO_DOT_NZ>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:59:57 +1200
Hi,
Look up "Recovery Model" in the docs. You describe the "Simple" model, but
the default is "Full"
Cheers
Doug Forster
"Sky" <public.skysigal{*AT*}xact-solutions.com> wrote in message
news:7D4573A7-C59D-49C1-9EDA-E529A377F4CC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Coming from a background of simpler file access, and simple databases for
that matter, I'm having a little trouble wrapping my mind around the log
file
concept.
If I understand this correctly, a log file, is a queue of pending
operations
writen to *before* writting to the database, and cleared *after* writting
to
the db, so that if there is a sudden shut down and restart, that pending
operations can be written to the database.
What I don't understand is why it remains biggish - or even there.
a) If the log file queue is processed, shouldn't the file size go back to
0?
I mean, all operations that were in it are now in the db, right?
b) And if filesize 0, why not delete it?
It just seems, from a newbie's point of view, a royal distraction....its
the
db we want, no, and once the log file has caught up with it/been zeroed
out,
why does it remain important?
Thanks for any help with understanding its importance, and its proper
place
in the role of things.
Sky
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Exact use of Log file - why so big?
- From: Sky
- Re: Exact use of Log file - why so big?
- From: Sky
- Re: Exact use of Log file - why so big?
- Prev by Date: RE: security
- Next by Date: Re: security
- Previous by thread: Re: Scale option not available
- Next by thread: Re: Exact use of Log file - why so big?
- Index(es):
Loading