Re: SQL 2005 Cluster Setup
- From: KA Kueh <KAKueh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:51:02 -0700
Hi,
I am looking at the load balancing story (Oracle RAC has that). I need to
be clear on this issue as I am going against Oracle RAC on this
scale-out/scale-up story line. Thanks.
Regards,
Kueh.
"Jasper Smith" wrote:
No (to the load balancing bit). SQL Server supports the idea of shared.
readonly databases (http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=910378) however I'm
guessing you mean something more like what Oracle offer with RAC? You can of
course implement it yourself (possibly using peer to peer replication) but
clustering in SQL Server is purely for availability and not for load
balancing
--
HTH,
Jasper Smith (SQL Server MVP)
http://www.sqldbatips.com
"KA Kueh" <KAKueh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:D3762172-8759-447F-9F70-A6F3DEA54099@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear all,
I would like to ask a seemly trivial question. Is it possible to setup an
Active/Active two node SQL cluster that has only one instance. I mean
that
the cluster would actually do load balancing when running.
Thank you.
Regards,
Kueh.
- References:
- Re: SQL 2005 Cluster Setup
- From: Jasper Smith
- Re: SQL 2005 Cluster Setup
- Prev by Date: Re: Processor Licensing
- Next by Date: Re: SQL Server Management Studio
- Previous by thread: Re: SQL 2005 Cluster Setup
- Next by thread: SQL Server Management Studio
- Index(es):