Re: Optimal drive\partition config for SQL

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance



It is really hard to say without knowing exactly how much read and write
activity these users generate in regards to SQL Server. But given those disk
restrictions I would opt for a 2 disk Raid 1 for the OS and SQL Transaction
logs (all dbs). Then take the remaining 4 or 6 drives in a RAID 10 for the
data and tempdb files. Backing up to the same Raid that the data or log
files are on is never really a good idea for availability and performance
reasons. But if you will immediately copy them to tape it may be OK.
Otherwise I recommend backing up to a remote share somewhere.

--
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP


"Ariel" <Ariel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:B410BD37-5DC1-43BE-871A-2500DB00C539@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hello,
>
> We are getting ready to migrate from a WMSDE based Windows Sharepoint
> Server
> deployment to SQL Server 2005. Here's the thing, I know nothing about
> SQL.
> But I'm guessing it's important to setup my HDDs properly to maximize SQL
> performance. I have about 50-60 WSS users that use the application to
> varying degrees. I have read that in order to optimize SQL performance, I
> should consider something like the following disk setup:
>
> array 1 : 2 disks, raid 1
> Part 1: win OS
> Part 2: tempdb
> Part 3: other log files
>
> array 2 : 4 disks, raid 10
> Part 1: all data,
>
> array 3 : 2 disks raid 1
> Part 1: main db (70% load) log files
> Part 2: temporary storage for backup, only used for maintenance.
>
> This looks good. It also looks expensive. Given my user load is light,
> do
> I really
> need this level of complexity, or can I just have 1 RAID 5 setup, or maybe
> RAID 1 for OS and RAID 5 for data? Any suggestion\recomendations would be
> greatly appreciated. Thanks!
>


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: New to clustering and need some clarification on disk resource
    ... So I have seperate cluster groups for MSCS, MSDTC, SQL, SQL Analysis. ... All have their own physical disk and MSCS and MSDTC have network name and IP ... Microsoft SQL Server MVP ... Is the shared disk for the cluster groups that I will install SQL Server ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering)
  • Re: Disk exchange on two-node MS SQL 2000 active/active cluster
    ... I support the Professional Association for SQL Server ... > I have two-node cluster on Windows 2000 Adv Server sp4. ... > physical disk owened by the first node, ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering)
  • Re: New to clustering and need some clarification on disk resource
    ... The clustered disk should have MDF and LDF files. ... Did you look at the SQL setup logs to see what went wrong? ... Microsoft SQL Server MVP ... running, quorum is clustered and running, cluster is healthy and i got 29 out ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering)
  • Re: Size of SQL IO block ?
    ... balacing various facotrs to achieve optimal performance. ... If you use RAID, then it depends ... SQL Server Storage Engine Development ... > Trying to understand how SQL writes data to disk? ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.server)
  • Re: SQL Server shared drives for cluster
    ... SQL Clusters use a local binary and a 'shared' data ... Windows Server 2003 and now recommend using a separate disk for MSDTC. ... but it is very easy to add another disk to the cluster ... I support the Professional Association for SQL Server ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering)