Re: SQL installation recommendations
- From: "Jasper Smith" <jasper_smith9@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 22:13:43 -0000
The idea is to isolate IO profiles. Data files tend to be random read/write
and log files are predominately sequential write. If your system for example
has C,D + E drives then Windows + pagefile on C, datafiles on D, log files
on E. It's irrelavent were you put the Program Files for SQL (assuming
you'll move tempdb to be on D + E in this example). It wouldn't be a good
idea to put the windows pagefile on the transaction log drive.
--
HTH
Jasper Smith (SQL Server MVP)
http://www.sqldbatips.com
I support PASS - the definitive, global
community for SQL Server professionals -
http://www.sqlpass.org
"Dan Carpenter" <eterra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u2laaf$3FHA.128@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hello,
>
> I was curious if it is recommended to install the SQL program files and
> Database files on separate partitions and what the reasons for doing so
> are. I am under the impression that this improves performance but I was
> looking for some explanation. Also, given how often the transaction logs
> are written to would it also be recommended to place them on yet another
> partition if one was available?
>
> The system I plan to install SQL 2005 on is using SCSI disks and it has 3
> RAID 1 partitions. I was planning on installing the program files on one,
> the database files on another, and the transaction files on the last one
> along with the page file. I was curious if this was a good idea. I can't
> seem to find any recommendations to do this in the offcial documentation
> so I was wondering if anyone could supply any links. Thank you.
>
> -Dan Carpenter
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SQL installation recommendations
- From: Hank Arnold
- Re: SQL installation recommendations
- Prev by Date: Re: AWE & PAE Assistance
- Next by Date: Re: Trying to run two MSDEs
- Previous by thread: Re: AWE & PAE Assistance
- Next by thread: Re: SQL installation recommendations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|