RE: To do or not to do the /3GB



So along this same thread, I have a Windows 2003 standard edition server
running Standard edition SQL 2000, the server has 4GB of RAM installed.
After reading all the threads and tech articles I tried adding the /3GB
switch in the BOOT.INI to see the results. I expected to see the Target
Server Memory counter for the object SQL Server:Memory Manager be at around
2.7GB as I understood that there is around 300MB reserved. The results
seemed not to indicate that, so I removed the switch, now I see the memory
counter to be around 1.7GB which is inline with the 2GB for SQL minus the
300MB reserved.

With SQL standard and Windows 2003 standard am I chasing something that
cannot be done with 4GB of RAM on this OS?

"Harolds" wrote:

> Thank you very much, this is exactly what I was looking for.
> --
> Harolds
>
>
> "Sophie Guo [MSFT]" wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Please refer to the following information in article 274750:
> >
> > 274750 How to configure memory for more than 2 GB in SQL Server
> > http://support.microsoft.com/?id=274750
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Windows 2000 Server
> >
> > SQL Server 2000
> >
> > Normally, both the SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition and SQL Server 2000
> > Developer Edition can use up to 2 GB of physical memory. With the use of
> > the AWE enable option, SQL Server can use up to 4 GB of physical memory.
> >
> > NOTE: You cannot allocate more than 4 GB of physical memory to an
> > application on Windows 2000 Server because Physical Address Extension (PAE)
> > is not available on Microsoft Windows 2000 Server. Also, you cannot use the
> > 3 GB switch in the Boot.ini file with Windows 2000 Server; however, you can
> > use the 3 GB switch in the Boot.ini file with Microsoft Windows 2000
> > Advanced Server or Microsoft Windows Datacenter versions. For additional
> > information, click the following article number to view the article in the
> > Microsoft Knowledge Base:
> >
> > 291988 (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/291988/) A description of the 4 GB
> > RAM Tuning feature and the Physical Address Extension switch
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > You cannot use the 3 GB switch in the Boot.ini file with Windows 2000
> > Server. However, you can enable AWE to use more memory:
> >
> > sp_configure 'show advanced options', 1
> > RECONFIGURE
> > GO
> > sp_configure 'awe enabled', 1
> > RECONFIGURE
> > GO
> > sp_configure 'max server memory', 4000
> > RECONFIGURE
> > GO
> >
> > Note: you need to restart SQL server.
> >
> >
> > Please refer to the following topics in SQL server 2000 Books Online(BOL):
> >
> > Managing AWE Memory
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/adminsql/ad
> > _1_server_1fnd.asp
> >
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/adminsql/ad
> > _config_3stg.asp
> >
> > FIX: Not all memory is available when AWE is enabled on a computer that is
> > running a 32-bit version of SQL Server 2000 SP4
> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/899761/
> >
> > I hope the information is helpful.
> >
> > Sophie Guo
> > Microsoft Online Partner Support
> >
> > Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
> >
> > =====================================================
> > When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
> > that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
> > =====================================================
> > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
> >
> >
> >
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Memory issues with 64-bit SQL Server 2005 on 64-bit Win 2003 C
    ... I also checked the individual patch levels for the .NET drivers, SQL Server ... The SQL Server is fully patched, however Windows Update reported that the OS ... Lock pages in memory -- I guess you might have taken care of it as well. ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering)
  • Re: Allocated Memory Alerts & Mem Usage vs. VM Size
    ... haven't added the /3GB switch. ... It's now been roughly a week since the change and the memory situation seems ... Although the memory settings I applied to the sql server instance ... Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: FTS Performance in SQL 2005
    ... I don't think you have left enough memory for the OS and MSSearch. ... Looking for a SQL Server replication book? ... Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.fulltext)
  • Re: HLA malloc problem
    ... but I personally don't run SQL server or something that needs ... doing this in large memory systems. ... switch to 32-bit coding until Win95 appeared. ... Would someone who has decided to pick up assembly language know what ...
    (comp.lang.asm.x86)
  • RE: Insufficient memory Available
    ... Insufficient memory available. ... within the scope of SQL Server. ... "MemToLeave" area. ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.server)

Loading