Re: datafile and log file on cluster
- From: "jason" <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:58:04 -0700
okay thanks for the info...i was thinking that it has more to do with having
the info on different disks....not having all the eggs in one basket....in
case you lose a disk.
i wasn't looking at it from a performance standpoint.
the more i think on it...i don't know if having one would do you any good
without the other anyway....would it?
"Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
> The performance and recovery guidelines don't change on a cluster. Using
> separate physical disks will always give better performance and
> recoverability than putting the log and data files on the same disks. If
> neither of these is important, then you have no reason to separate the
> files.
>
> Geoff N. Hiten
> Senior Database Administrator
> Microsoft SQL Server MVP
>
>
> "jason" <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:C23E6B55-B1CF-44D9-B61C-DBD2396EF62A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > hi,
> > i think i know the answer...but want a sanity check.
> >
> > i have a ss cluster i use for many different dbs.
> > i have mulitple shared disk i can utilize for the dbs.
> >
> > is there big reason i should keep the data file on a different disk than i
> > keep the log file...or if i can deal with data loss up till my last
> > backup...can i just put them on the same disk?
> >
> > what would be better?
> > thanks.
>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: datafile and log file on cluster
- From: Geoff N. Hiten
- Re: datafile and log file on cluster
- References:
- datafile and log file on cluster
- From: jason
- Re: datafile and log file on cluster
- From: Geoff N. Hiten
- datafile and log file on cluster
- Prev by Date: Re: did service pack got installed?
- Next by Date: Re: Differences between SQL SP3 and SP4
- Previous by thread: Re: datafile and log file on cluster
- Next by thread: Re: datafile and log file on cluster
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|