Re: SQL optimal configuration
- From: "Hank Arnold" <rasilon@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 05:23:30 -0400
Then at least post the newsgroup name...... ".server" really doesn't narrow
it down....
--
Regards,
Hank Arnold
"Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ek4%23%23j$bFHA.1404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi
>
> If the original poster were to post correctly, by cross posting, and not
> multi posting, everyone would have the benefit.
>
> We generally post where it was answered in so that we don't have 2 or more
> thread developing and never helping the poster.
>
> Regards
> --------------------------------
> Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
> Zurich, Switzerland
>
> IM: mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
>
> Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
>
> "Hank Arnold" <rasilon@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:OAFoqf$bFHA.3464@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Is it possible to post a link to the posting and response? I'm interested
>> in the answer, but I don't want to have to follow another newsgroup just
>> to get a single posting.....
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Hank Arnold
>>
>> "Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:uSs%23ek2bFHA.3280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Answered in .server
>>>
>>> Please do not multi post.
>>> --------------------------------
>>> Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
>>> Zurich, Switzerland
>>>
>>> IM: mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
>>>
>>> Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
>>>
>>> "George" <George@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:9B11190E-70B9-47D6-93D1-BE156AD07BFC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Hi,
>>>> We use sql 2000 for our inhouse applications. About 200+ users access
>>>> it and
>>>> it runs on dual Xeon 3Ghz machines DELL branded. We use RAID1 for c:\
>>>> OS;
>>>> RAID1 for G:\ SQL system files; RAID10 for SQL database drive and RAID1
>>>> for
>>>> the sql logs.
>>>> CPU power seems enough, but we have disk access problems mainly with
>>>> writing
>>>> of the data. Is there disk configuration rule as such? Do you think we
>>>> are
>>>> using wrong types of arrays?
>>>> SQL 2000 Ent runs on both W2k and W2003 in our company.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> --
>>>> George
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SQL optimal configuration
- From: Mike Epprecht \(SQL MVP\)
- Re: SQL optimal configuration
- References:
- SQL optimal configuration
- From: George
- Re: SQL optimal configuration
- From: Mike Epprecht \(SQL MVP\)
- Re: SQL optimal configuration
- From: Hank Arnold
- Re: SQL optimal configuration
- From: Mike Epprecht \(SQL MVP\)
- SQL optimal configuration
- Prev by Date: Re: SQL optimal configuration
- Next by Date: Re: SQL optimal configuration
- Previous by thread: Re: SQL optimal configuration
- Next by thread: Re: SQL optimal configuration
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
