Re: SQL 2000 installation advice needed
- From: kvr901 <kvr901@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 10:06:05 -0700
Thank you for your reply.
Regarding the "named pipes" option. Is there any reason I should not select
this option when installing SQL Server?
"Jens Süßmeyer" wrote:
> > Warning: beginner here.
>
> Welcome. ;-)
>
> Is there any **compelling** reason I should not use the Win2k3
> > Administrator account?
>
> If you mean with that the local administrator account, there might be some
> reason not to choose this, instead of choosing a domain accounts. Domain
> Accounts can be granted extended access to network ressource (as long as you
> will need them) e.g. Mail access, file share access etc. By using a "login
> as a service" account the security is improced because of having a
> privileged user who won´t be able to logon interactively at workstations. As
> far as you won´t need any permissions in your network or other ressources,
> you can head for the network service account or the local system account.
>
>
> Security is not very important to me. I have
> > Ghost backups of the operating system, and will backup the database daily.
> > I
> > can restore the operating system in a few minutes.
>
> Thats nothing about security as the meaning I have of it. So your data will
> be restored quickly in the case of any data loss, but the planning of
> security should be done even if you got an internal low priority app or a
> productional OLTP system. (my two pence, perhaps it´s the schizophrenic part
> in me :-))
>
> > Another question: during installation of SQL Server 2000 it asks
> > something
> > about using "named pipes". Not having a clue what "named pipes" are I
> > always
> > select the default. Is there anything wrong with that?
>
>
> http://www.linktionary.com/n/named_pipes.html
>
> HTH, Jens Suessmeyer.
>
> ---
> http://www.sqlserver2005.de
> ---
>
>
>
>
> "kvr901" <kvr901@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:CD307AC4-72CD-4D41-9EE0-7DE7E7495939@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Warning: beginner here.
> >
> > I have installed SQL Server 2000 Enterprise on my Win2003Server box
> > several
> > times (each time using a clean installation of Win2k3), and not had any
> > problems. I can use the database fine both directly from other computers
> > and
> > through a small ASP.NET web application.
> >
> > The beginners book I am using "Microsoft SQL Server 2000 for Dummies"
> > suggests using a "Domain User Account". It goes on to say the account
> > should
> > be a member of the Administrators group, password never expires, log on as
> > service rights.
> >
> > So far I have been creating a user with those attributes, but I am
> > wondering.... Is there any **compelling** reason I should not use the
> > Win2k3
> > Administrator account? It would make my life simpler to not have to
> > document
> > another user and password. Security is not very important to me. I have
> > Ghost backups of the operating system, and will backup the database daily.
> > I
> > can restore the operating system in a few minutes.
> >
> > After a while I will eventually use SQL Server for a small web
> > application.
> > The Win2k3 server will not be used for anything else. The server machine
> > is
> > not used for anything on my small network. All use will be for incoming
> > internet access to the small ASP.NET application I am building.
> >
> >
> > Another question: during installation of SQL Server 2000 it asks
> > something
> > about using "named pipes". Not having a clue what "named pipes" are I
> > always
> > select the default. Is there anything wrong with that?
> >
> > TIA
> >
> >
>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SQL 2000 installation advice needed
- From: kvr901
- Re: SQL 2000 installation advice needed
- From: Jens Süßmeyer
- Re: SQL 2000 installation advice needed
- References:
- SQL 2000 installation advice needed
- From: kvr901
- Re: SQL 2000 installation advice needed
- From: Jens Süßmeyer
- SQL 2000 installation advice needed
- Prev by Date: User acces for creating databases in SQL
- Next by Date: Re: SQL 2000 installation advice needed
- Previous by thread: Re: SQL 2000 installation advice needed
- Next by thread: Re: SQL 2000 installation advice needed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading