SQL server 2000 Hardware

From: Homer (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 08/10/04 

Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 03:15:16 -0700

Keith

I see your point.

It will be a database with approximately 300 users. It
has to be available 24/7 and reliable, so will require
RAID, but which one? Cluster, I don't know if the shared
info goes down we lose availability?

Thanks.....

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Measuring IOPS and Raid penalty
    ... volumes on 15k ROM disks and split the database, ... Before we had a single database and it was on a RAID 5 ... reason for this is that log bufferes are allocated on a per storage group ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • Re: Cluster will not fail over.
    ... > As far as the TCP/IP issue goes, you had to rebuild the cluster and were ... > able to restore the master database. ... > a cluster installation you'll have to revisit. ... >> This worked bringing up the sql server in minimal mode. ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering)
  • Re: Splitting our Exchange 2003 Ent Database
    ... it's own memory management of buffers. ... allocated for database pages, and when a page is not present a database page ... RAID and RAID card) affect the speed of the Physical Disk - sec/write on ... In my eyes they are working on different spindles. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • Re: Third party Windows App to NFS map OpenVMS to Windows Server
    ... How to Setup an NFS Server Using TCPIP ... or as an option of the database to be installed on ... The site which was working correctly had configured their Rdb DB system ... as a member of a larger OpenVMS cluster, and the site with the problems ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: The 9997th file specific DOSFS problem
    ... The average performance of accessing the raid, single file I/O, is ... The 512 bytes "tiny cache" for the FAT is very intersting. ...  The larger the cluster size, ...
    (comp.os.vxworks)
Loading