Re: SQL Server 50% slower running on SAN
From: Burkhard (bmeier_at_infogenesis.com)
Date: 03/01/05
- Next message: Andrew J. Kelly: "Re: Allocating memory"
- Previous message: Mike Hodgson: "Re: Allocating memory"
- In reply to: Adam Machanic: "Re: SQL Server 50% slower running on SAN"
- Next in thread: pdxJaxon: "Re: SQL Server 50% slower running on SAN"
- Reply: pdxJaxon: "Re: SQL Server 50% slower running on SAN"
- Reply: pdxJaxon: "Re: SQL Server 50% slower running on SAN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:21:57 -0800
Hello Adam,
Yes, SQL Server is cranking at 100% CPU usage for more
than 3 hours when writing to the SAN. It is also using up
to 100% when writing to the local drive, but it is just
much faster. What takes 3 hours on the SAN is accomplished
in 1.5 hours writing locally.
We do notice in perfmon that the Bytes Total/sec for the
Network Interface counter is very low for SQL Server
processing compared to performing a file copy/transfer.
SQL Server only writes Avg: 13,000 , Max: 28,308 bytes per
sec, while a file transfer gives us Avg: 10,000,000 , Max:
36,769,205.
Note: We just found out that the .exe that is writing to
SQL Server was a version which has been hot fixed in the
meantime. This version had unnecessary excessive logging
to the Windows Event log. Running the hot fixed .exe that
does not do this writing to the Event log now gives us
much better performance and our problem seems to be solved.
Thanks for your quick reply.
Burkhard
>-----Original Message-----
>Have you used perfmon to find out where the bottleneck is?
>
>
>--
>Adam Machanic
>SQL Server MVP
>http://www.sqljunkies.com/weblog/amachanic
>--
>
>
>"Burkhard" <bmeier@infogenesis.com> wrote in message
>news:2b2601c51dec$c2d73be0$a601280a@phx.gbl...
>> We are in the final tests of running SQL Server on the
SAN
>> we are about to deploy to our data center. During QA
>> testing we are noticing a 50% increase in processing
speed
>> even though the SAN seems to be configured correctly.
>> Any idea where to look further would be appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Burkhard
>> QA Tester
>
>
>.
>
- Next message: Andrew J. Kelly: "Re: Allocating memory"
- Previous message: Mike Hodgson: "Re: Allocating memory"
- In reply to: Adam Machanic: "Re: SQL Server 50% slower running on SAN"
- Next in thread: pdxJaxon: "Re: SQL Server 50% slower running on SAN"
- Reply: pdxJaxon: "Re: SQL Server 50% slower running on SAN"
- Reply: pdxJaxon: "Re: SQL Server 50% slower running on SAN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|