Re: SQL Server 50% slower running on SAN
From: Adam Machanic (amachanic_at_hotmail._removetoemail_.com)
Date: 02/28/05
- Next message: Mike Hodgson: "Re: Allocating memory"
- Previous message: Burkhard: "SQL Server 50% slower running on SAN"
- In reply to: Burkhard: "SQL Server 50% slower running on SAN"
- Next in thread: Burkhard: "Re: SQL Server 50% slower running on SAN"
- Reply: Burkhard: "Re: SQL Server 50% slower running on SAN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:38:53 -0500
Have you used perfmon to find out where the bottleneck is?
-- Adam Machanic SQL Server MVP http://www.sqljunkies.com/weblog/amachanic -- "Burkhard" <bmeier@infogenesis.com> wrote in message news:2b2601c51dec$c2d73be0$a601280a@phx.gbl... > We are in the final tests of running SQL Server on the SAN > we are about to deploy to our data center. During QA > testing we are noticing a 50% increase in processing speed > even though the SAN seems to be configured correctly. > Any idea where to look further would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > Burkhard > QA Tester
- Next message: Mike Hodgson: "Re: Allocating memory"
- Previous message: Burkhard: "SQL Server 50% slower running on SAN"
- In reply to: Burkhard: "SQL Server 50% slower running on SAN"
- Next in thread: Burkhard: "Re: SQL Server 50% slower running on SAN"
- Reply: Burkhard: "Re: SQL Server 50% slower running on SAN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|