Re: SnapshotIsolation Level and Com
From: wei xiao (weix_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 02/02/05
- Next message: jonjo: "registering servers"
- Previous message: Tibor Karaszi: "Re: SQL 2005 & Spatial Data"
- In reply to: Jamie: "SnapshotIsolation Level and Com"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 02:17:06 -0800
COM+ often uses distributed transaction to talk with SQL Server. As a new
feature in SQL Server 2005, snapshot isolation is not supported in a
distributed transaction.
We recommend that you use "read committed snapshot isolation" instead of
"snapshot isolation" in COM+. Please see books online and the following
white paper for more details:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/SQL05B.mspx
-- Wei Xiao [MSFT] SQL Server Storage Engine Development http://weblogs.asp.net/weix This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. "Jamie" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:2ef301c5086e$7aebb6a0$a401280a@phx.gbl... > Hi, > > I am trying to run some tests using the new Snapshot > Isolation level in SQL Server 2005 and have a question. > > Our application connects via COM+ and I believe that any > isolation levels set at database level will be overidden > by the isolation level set on the Com objects. > > I was led to believe that it is possible to set the > Isolation level on the Com object on Windows 2003. If > so, where is it and what level is it? > > I have looked at setting the Transaction Support level on > the Com+ component in question but I am not sure which > one to select. The following ones are listed: Any, Read > Committed, Read UnCommitted, Repeatable Read and > Serialized. > > Am I looking in the right place? Any suggestions would > be gratefully recieved. > > Jamie.
- Next message: jonjo: "registering servers"
- Previous message: Tibor Karaszi: "Re: SQL 2005 & Spatial Data"
- In reply to: Jamie: "SnapshotIsolation Level and Com"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|