Re: reordering in paralellism-multiprocessor machine
From: Scott Morris (bogus_at_bogus.com)
Date: 12/22/04
- Next message: Todd: "Re: SQL Triggers and VFP Table Connection"
- Previous message: Keith Kratochvil: "Re: Why i can not see my harddisk drive - d drive"
- In reply to: Saravana: "Re: reordering in paralellism-multiprocessor machine"
- Next in thread: Andrew J. Kelly: "Re: reordering in paralellism-multiprocessor machine"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 09:07:24 -0500
As I said - no order by clause, no guarantee. There is a thread in
.progamming with the subject "order by and identity" that was active
yesterday. You might find the discussion interesting as it deals with the
same basic issue. You can search the newsgroups for discussions / rants on
this FAQ.
"Saravana" <Saravana@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:0FD75B28-2543-4128-8F6F-E888F5110751@microsoft.com...
> Scott,
> Isn't there any other way of stopping this reordering: tweaking of the
> tables, or the columns..
> In other words: what is the exact quantitative statistic that is
considered
> by the server for executing a query paralelly or serially.. i came to know
> about execution costs, but i am not able to get any useful information
from
> the execution plans from the query anaylzer. What i am more concerned is
that
> query 2 is re-ordered whereas query 1 is ordered...
> Thanks.
>
> "Scott Morris" wrote:
>
> > This has been discussed ad-nauseum. The order of returned rows is never
> > guaranteed unless the query includes an order by clause.
> >
>
- Next message: Todd: "Re: SQL Triggers and VFP Table Connection"
- Previous message: Keith Kratochvil: "Re: Why i can not see my harddisk drive - d drive"
- In reply to: Saravana: "Re: reordering in paralellism-multiprocessor machine"
- Next in thread: Andrew J. Kelly: "Re: reordering in paralellism-multiprocessor machine"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|