Re: Maximum practical number of databases per SQL Server 2000 Instance
From: Mike Epprecht \(SQL MVP\) (mike_at_epprecht.net)
Date: 12/15/04
- Next message: David Gugick: "Re: Inserting/Updating and locking"
- Previous message: David Gugick: "Re: Inserting/Updating and locking"
- In reply to: Bob Castleman: "Re: Maximum practical number of databases per SQL Server 2000 Instance"
- Next in thread: Cesar: "Re: Maximum practical number of databases per SQL Server 2000 Inst"
- Reply: Cesar: "Re: Maximum practical number of databases per SQL Server 2000 Inst"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 23:07:34 +0100
Hi
There are some KB articles on what needs to changed in SQL Server for it to
work well with more than 1'000 DB's. It comes down to having enough memory
available for the file structures. I don't have the KB at hand.
The more DB's you have, the more difficult it is to manage them with
Enterprise Manager. And one big issue, they all share TempDB, so if the
applications are written badly, you have a nice bottleneck.
I have tested to 600 DB's. Shutdown does take a while, and so does startup.
Enterprise Manager took 32 seconds to render the screen.
If I were you, and it is possible in your scenario, I would run multiple
instances with about 100 DB's per instance. Then, applying a SP or a hotfix
does not affect every DB, neither does a failure.
Regards
--------------------------------
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"Bob Castleman" <nomail@here> wrote in message
news:#xuo4wu4EHA.2124@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> We have hundreds of databases on our cluster. It creates some interesting
> issue (starting and stopping the service takes a looooong time, for
> example). But it runs pretty smoothly, all things considered.
>
> Bob Castleman
> SuccessWare Software
> "Cesar" <Cesar@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:1FCBB476-FEC0-493C-AA99-D7BF6E867B84@microsoft.com...
> > Does anyone know what the maximum practical number of databases that
could
> > be
> > created and used per a SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Instance. I know that
> > the
> > theoretical limit in BooksOnLine is 32K. But my application is dying
way
> > before that.
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > Cesar
>
>
- Next message: David Gugick: "Re: Inserting/Updating and locking"
- Previous message: David Gugick: "Re: Inserting/Updating and locking"
- In reply to: Bob Castleman: "Re: Maximum practical number of databases per SQL Server 2000 Instance"
- Next in thread: Cesar: "Re: Maximum practical number of databases per SQL Server 2000 Inst"
- Reply: Cesar: "Re: Maximum practical number of databases per SQL Server 2000 Inst"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|