Re: tempdb mdf and ldf placement
From: Ron Talmage (rtalmage_at_prospice.com)
Date: 12/12/04
- Next message: Ron Talmage: "Re: SQL Server Clustering - Stopping SQL Related Services"
- Previous message: Ron Talmage: "Re: What's the proper syntax for this?"
- In reply to: Kelly F.: "tempdb mdf and ldf placement"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 17:01:55 -0800
Kelly,
Usually tempdb does not benefit from separating the MDF from LDF because
tempdb does not use the transaction log quite as much as other databases.
You need to test it.
Ron
-- Ron Talmage SQL Server MVP "Kelly F." <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:2d8301c4def6$ba9d2b40$a301280a@phx.gbl... > I believe tempdb should be on its own set of hard drives, > meaning not with other sqlserver.exe and not with the MDF > or LDF files from user or system databases. Since it > remains in simple recovery mode, is it important to split > the tempdb MDF and LDF to separate hard drives or can they > be on the same hard drive (raid array) together? > > Kelly
- Next message: Ron Talmage: "Re: SQL Server Clustering - Stopping SQL Related Services"
- Previous message: Ron Talmage: "Re: What's the proper syntax for this?"
- In reply to: Kelly F.: "tempdb mdf and ldf placement"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]