Re: From BAD To WORSE: A Disasterous Delete
From: Tibor Karaszi (tibor_please.no.email_karaszi_at_hotmail.nomail.com)
Date: 10/29/04
- Next message: Tibor Karaszi: "Re: stored procedure"
- Previous message: Alejandro Mesa: "RE: Join Styles"
- In reply to: John Bishop: "From BAD To WORSE: A Disasterous Delete"
- Next in thread: John Bishop: "Re: From BAD To WORSE: A Disasterous Delete"
- Reply: John Bishop: "Re: From BAD To WORSE: A Disasterous Delete"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:15:43 +0200
> DOES SQL 2000 DELETE ALL RECORDS WHEN THE DATA TYPE OF A SINGLE COLUMN IS
> ALTERED???
No. You have either hit a bug, or something went very wrong. But without a repro, it is hard for us
to comment any further. Most of us prefer to execute TSQL statements from Query Analyzer for these
types of changes as it gives us better control, and we know exactly what commands are executed...
-- Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/ "John Bishop" <ugradfrnd@aol.com> wrote in message news:eDbrR9bvEHA.3896@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > Last night, I posted the message "HELP!: A Disasterous Delete" (Friday, > October 29, 2004 1:20 AM). This morning, as I pressed ahead with my work > with my smaller data extract, I have had a recurrence of the problem of the > mysterious deletion of ALL RECORDS, but now with the smaller data extract. > > But I have a better sense now of what may have CAUSED the problem (I think). > I had just used SQL Server Enterprise Manager to Change the Data Type of two > columns from char to nvarchar. I was then re-running a query. Thereafter, > in noticed that ALL ROWS of the table seemed to be missing. > > Perhaps I am SPOILED by the way MS Access handles changes to a datastructure > with data records in place. > > DOES SQL 2000 DELETE ALL RECORDS WHEN THE DATA TYPE OF A SINGLE COLUMN IS > ALTERED??? This seems like a rather radical treatment to the data within a > table if this is the case. > > Now I seem to have lost NOT ONLY the original larger 9 million record data > table, but also the smaller 350,000 record data extract. > > Maybe I should just throw in the towel! > > Any suggestions are appreciated!! > >
- Next message: Tibor Karaszi: "Re: stored procedure"
- Previous message: Alejandro Mesa: "RE: Join Styles"
- In reply to: John Bishop: "From BAD To WORSE: A Disasterous Delete"
- Next in thread: John Bishop: "Re: From BAD To WORSE: A Disasterous Delete"
- Reply: John Bishop: "Re: From BAD To WORSE: A Disasterous Delete"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|