Re: cant get the correct num of rows from Oracle. in 2 SQL servers ( sql 7.0 and SQL 2000)
From: Tibor Karaszi (tibor_please.no.email_karaszi_at_hotmail.nomail.com)
Date: 10/19/04
- Next message: Keith Langmead: "Re: disconnecting yourself after setting db to single user"
- Previous message: Tibor Karaszi: "Re: Backup claims to have run, but there's no file"
- In reply to: Melih SARICA: "Re: cant get the correct num of rows from Oracle. in 2 SQL servers ( sql 7.0 and SQL 2000)"
- Next in thread: Melih SARICA: "Re: cant get the correct num of rows from Oracle. in 2 SQL servers ( sql 7.0 and SQL 2000)"
- Reply: Melih SARICA: "Re: cant get the correct num of rows from Oracle. in 2 SQL servers ( sql 7.0 and SQL 2000)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:14:03 +0200
I was referring to tracing the SQL query, not the result.
-- Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/ "Melih SARICA" <melihsarica@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:elS%23DKetEHA.2072@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > Hi Tibor.. > > I did Trace it on Oracle.. > > In trace Oracle Send number of 49439 rows for all queries, but SQL 200 and > SQL 7.0 get rows different. > > And Also i did try it with an Test Oracle Server.. > > Its the same.. > > SQL 2000 get 99 rows less then SQL 7.0 > > > > "Tibor Karaszi" <tibor_please.no.email_karaszi@hotmail.nomail.com> wrote in > message news:e0kGfVdtEHA.2072@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... >> The reason I asked to post the query was to see whether there is anything > in the query that can >> explain the difference. As I said in the original post, one such > possibility id difference regarding >> handling of NULLs. >> >> Also, did you try to catch the SQL statement submitted form SQL Server to > Oracle to see if they are >> the same from 7.0 and 2000? >> >> -- >> Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP >> http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp >> http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/ >> >> >> "Melih SARICA" <melihsarica@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:usBSPMdtEHA.4040@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... >> > This Query is just an Example.. >> > >> > When i run this query in Oracle number of rows is the same as SQL server > 7.0 >> > it returns 49439 .. >> > >> > Both MDAC versions are 2.8 >> > Both Oracle ODBC Drivers r same 9.2.0.5 >> > >> > i did try all attributes.. and check hundreds of pages from MSDN or OTN > but >> > no solution yet .. >> > >> > when i try to get records from Oracle there is always 99 rows > difference. >> > between SQL 2000 and SQL 7.0 >> > >> > Not according to rowsize, or table or other things... >> > >> > >> > >> > "Tibor Karaszi" <tibor_please.no.email_karaszi@hotmail.nomail.com> wrote > in >> > message news:u%23c3xDdtEHA.1720@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... >> >> Is there a tool like Profiler available for Oracle? If so, can you > trace >> > the query submitted to >> >> Oracle and see if they are the same? What if you execute the same query >> > directly on the Oracle >> >> Server? What number of rows is the correct number? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP >> >> http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp >> >> http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/ >> >> >> >> >> >> "Melih SARICA" <melihsarica@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:%23pKPi9ctEHA.2520@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... >> >> > Ty tibor.. >> >> > >> >> > Query is the same >> >> > >> >> > select count(*) from openquery(baanb,'select t$item from >> > baan.ttiitm001501') >> >> > >> >> > in SQL server 7.0 this query returns 49439 >> >> > >> >> > in SQL server 2000 it returns 49340 >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > and not only in this query .. if number of rows returned from the >> > openquery >> >> > statement get biggers number of lost rows get bigger too >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > "Tibor Karaszi" <tibor_please.no.email_karaszi@hotmail.nomail.com> > wrote >> > in >> >> > message news:Oi34g5ctEHA.636@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... >> >> >> Possibly handling of NULLS can cause a difference. Can you post the > two >> >> > queries? >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP >> >> >> http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp >> >> >> http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Melih SARICA" <melihsarica@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> news:%23szluxctEHA.3156@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... >> >> >> >I ve got an Oracle 9. server running on AIx. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > and One SQL Server 2000 Sp 3on w2k >> >> >> > and SQL server 7 on Winnt 4.0 >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > i did link this Oracle server on both SQL serevrs. When run an > simple >> >> > SQL >> >> >> > query i got different results. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Num of rows are always different In SQL server 7.0 i got 49430 > rows( >> >> > when i >> >> >> > check in oracle its correct) >> >> >> > In SQL SErver > 2000 >> > i >> >> > got >> >> >> > 49336 rows. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Any idea ? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> > >
- Next message: Keith Langmead: "Re: disconnecting yourself after setting db to single user"
- Previous message: Tibor Karaszi: "Re: Backup claims to have run, but there's no file"
- In reply to: Melih SARICA: "Re: cant get the correct num of rows from Oracle. in 2 SQL servers ( sql 7.0 and SQL 2000)"
- Next in thread: Melih SARICA: "Re: cant get the correct num of rows from Oracle. in 2 SQL servers ( sql 7.0 and SQL 2000)"
- Reply: Melih SARICA: "Re: cant get the correct num of rows from Oracle. in 2 SQL servers ( sql 7.0 and SQL 2000)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|