Re: Newbie: I don't understand user permissions for table access
From: Larry Woods (larry_at_NOSPAMlwoods.com)
Date: 07/28/04
- Next message: Adam Machanic: "Public SS2005 newsgroups"
- Previous message: Matthew Bando: "SQL Server Interview questions"
- In reply to: Keith Kratochvil: "Re: Newbie: I don't understand user permissions for table access"
- Next in thread: Keith Kratochvil: "Re: Newbie: I don't understand user permissions for table access"
- Reply: Keith Kratochvil: "Re: Newbie: I don't understand user permissions for table access"
- Reply: Peter the Spate: "Re: Newbie: I don't understand user permissions for table access"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:43:53 -0700
My database is remote to my workstation. I am using EM on the workstation.
The database has a userid/password (not 'sa') but the userid has "public"
and "db_owner" roles. Does the "db_owner" have complete access to all
tables/fields WITHOUT specifying anything in the permissions dialogs?
My "public" role only has "SELECT" and "EXEC" permissions.
Thanks, again.
Larry Woods
And,
"Keith Kratochvil" <sqlguy.back2u@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:%23PTfc5KdEHA.3728@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> wrong
> table permissions are important. They are required in order to
> access/update/delete data.
>
> HOW are you connecting to SQL Server?
> NT Authentication?
> SQL Server Authentication?
>
> If SQL Server auth, what account are you using? sa? If so, that is the
> "GOD" account. You have full permissions to do anything and everything.
>
> If you are using NT auth, what rights does your NT account have? Is it
> assigned server or database roles that allow the activities that you are
> performing?
>
> Finally, what rights/permissions have been granted to the PUBLIC role?
> Often (unfortunately) companies simply grant all rights to the public
> role...and then evey account (SQL and NT) inherit the rights assigned to
the
> public role. For obvious reasons this is a bad security model.
>
> SQL Server has a strong security model and it works well when it is setup
by
> someone who knows what they are doing. In the wrong hands....
>
> --
> Keith
>
>
> "Larry Woods" <larry@NOSPAMlwoods.com> wrote in message
> news:eM31J1KdEHA.3864@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > I have a SQL Server database that has database userid/password
protection.
> > When I open the database through EM I can add/delete/modify any table,
but
> > when I look at the permissions for any of the tables there are NO
options
> > set for any user of the database! I don't understand the purpose of the
> > permissions, I guess, since they don't have to be set in order to get
> access
> > to the tables.
> >
> > TIA,
> >
> > Larry Woods
> >
> >
>
- Next message: Adam Machanic: "Public SS2005 newsgroups"
- Previous message: Matthew Bando: "SQL Server Interview questions"
- In reply to: Keith Kratochvil: "Re: Newbie: I don't understand user permissions for table access"
- Next in thread: Keith Kratochvil: "Re: Newbie: I don't understand user permissions for table access"
- Reply: Keith Kratochvil: "Re: Newbie: I don't understand user permissions for table access"
- Reply: Peter the Spate: "Re: Newbie: I don't understand user permissions for table access"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|