Re: Recommendations for where to keep the data and logs
From: Timothy Ross (ross_timothy_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 07/09/04
- Next message: Andrew J. Kelly: "Re: Backup fails, where more details?"
- Previous message: Andrew J. Kelly: "Re: SQL Server 2000 Hardware Recommendations?"
- In reply to: Jaxon: "Re: Recommendations for where to keep the data and logs"
- Next in thread: Jaxon: "Re: Recommendations for where to keep the data and logs"
- Reply: Jaxon: "Re: Recommendations for where to keep the data and logs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:41:47 -0400
I have never heard of RAID 1+0. I thought it was RAID 10 or RAID 0+1.
Either way, this existing server has 3 sets of RAID 1 and that is what I
have to deal with (just trying to do the best with what I have).
TR
"Jaxon" <GregoryAJackson@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uAI7dQdZEHA.1764@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> correction.
>
> for "best" performance, the data files should be put on RAID 1+0
>
>
> GAJ
>
>
- Next message: Andrew J. Kelly: "Re: Backup fails, where more details?"
- Previous message: Andrew J. Kelly: "Re: SQL Server 2000 Hardware Recommendations?"
- In reply to: Jaxon: "Re: Recommendations for where to keep the data and logs"
- Next in thread: Jaxon: "Re: Recommendations for where to keep the data and logs"
- Reply: Jaxon: "Re: Recommendations for where to keep the data and logs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
