Re: Outlook and SQL2000

From: robert_at_cbb (robertatcbb_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 07/02/04


Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 10:20:01 -0700

Thank you Mark. I read a few of the articles and found that I need to have a domain account if I use exchange which I do. Then the article went on to describe a way to create a mapi profile without installing outlook. Can I use this? I run sql2000 on a win2000 server.

"Mark Allison" wrote:

> robert_at_cbb ,
>
> That's my point, you don't need to be logged on when using MAPI (the
> Outlook client). See the articles below for information on how to set it up.
>
> INF: How to Configure SQL Mail
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=263556
>
> INF: Frequently Asked Questions - SQL Server - SQL Mail
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=311231
>
> INF: Common SQL Mail Problems
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=315886
>
> HOW TO: Troubleshoot SQL Mail with Microsoft Exchange Server
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=153159
>
> You've got mail - or have you?
> http://www.allisonmitchell.com/Articles/mail.htm
>
> --
> Mark Allison, SQL Server MVP
> http://www.markallison.co.uk
>
> Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
>
>
> robert_at_cbb wrote:
> > Mark,
> >
> > One of the issues I had on installing outlook on my servers is that some of them are local accounts only. HOw would I go about using outlook without creating a domain local admin from being logged in all the time?
> >
> > "Mark Allison" wrote:
> >
> >
> >>robert_at_cbb,
> >>
> >>Well, outlook doesn't have to be running for you to be able to use
> >>SQLMail. The server will be logged off. If you restrict who can log on
> >>to the server console, and those people can be trusted not to abuse
> >>Outlook, then I can't see a problem.
> >>--
> >>Mark Allison, SQL Server MVP
> >>http://www.markallison.co.uk
> >>
> >>Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
> >>http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>robert_at_cbb wrote:
> >>
> >>>I am having some issues with our security department in regards to having to have outlook on the SQL server. Basically their afraid the server can be comprimised through Outlook.
> >>>
> >>>Does anyone have any thoughts on this? I tried another program STMPT but found it hard to setup and use. Basically it I can no longer use the alerts I created in SQL.
> >>
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Outlook and SQL2000
    ... I've never tried it without Outlook. ... Mark Allison, SQL Server MVP ... Looking for a SQL Server replication book? ... Frequently Asked Questions - SQL Server - SQL Mail ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.server)
  • Re: Outlook and SQL2000
    ... Frequently Asked Questions - SQL Server - SQL Mail ... Mark Allison, SQL Server MVP ... > One of the issues I had on installing outlook on my servers is that some of them are local accounts only. ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.server)
  • Re: Configuring SQL Mail without Outlook
    ... Outlook is the only MAPI provider available. ... They are not drop-in replacements for SQL Mail, but can do most all of the ... I support the Professional Association for SQL Server ... > SQLAgentMail service) but does not want to install Outlook on the server. ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.server)
  • Re: problem with sql mail
    ... If you are running SQL Server 2000, SQL Mail for SQL Server ... folder. ... >running with outlook ... ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.server)
  • Re: Conversation view
    ... Jocelyn Fiorello [MVP - Outlook] wrote: ... Mark Allison, SQL Server MVP ...
    (microsoft.public.outlook)