Re: SQL Server to Oracel
omlet_at_omlet.org
Date: 06/29/04
- Next message: KenA: "Constraint Doubt"
- Previous message: MailMan: "SqlMail"
- In reply to: Joel Garry: "Re: SQL Server to Oracel"
- Next in thread: David Fitzjarrell: "Re: SQL Server to Oracel"
- Reply: David Fitzjarrell: "Re: SQL Server to Oracel"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 29 Jun 2004 15:31:58 -0700
joel-garry@home.com (Joel Garry) wrote in message
>
> "In general, if recursive calls is greater than 4 per process, the
> data dictionary should be optimized and segments should be rebuilt
> with storage clauses to have a few large extents. "
> - OraclE 9I Performance Tuning WITH OMLET [
This is a product for 8i,9i,10g! So your comments are misplaced. Self
tuning; local management, undo segments and db_cache_size are not as
widely used as you think. Of course, you are entitled to your opinion;
you write books that you sell for $100 and as such you better be
giving people their money's worth.
The book is about OMLET and tuning Oracle with OMLET; as such, only
queries that made it into a version are reflected in the book. It is
not targeting general audience.
> He even thanks Digital!
I worked for Digital Rdb - the KODA group; and joined Oracle when they
bought the Digital rdbms business and as such I thank Digital for
doing that: having access to the Rdb code; which SQL server borrowed
heavily. I added index only tables to Rdb and later to Oracle kernel.
Of course your mother helped me do that; she s*** nicely!
> Jeez, makes me
> nostalgic.
see a doctor; perhaps the rags slipped! got the OMLET treatment or
both!
>
> Note to all Oracle professionals: re-read the manuals for new
> versions, and pay attention to people who point out errors.
I guess Oracle profs are capable of do that by themselves. Do not
insult them or their intel. with your crab.
>
> jg
- Next message: KenA: "Constraint Doubt"
- Previous message: MailMan: "SqlMail"
- In reply to: Joel Garry: "Re: SQL Server to Oracel"
- Next in thread: David Fitzjarrell: "Re: SQL Server to Oracel"
- Reply: David Fitzjarrell: "Re: SQL Server to Oracel"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
