Re: Blocking UDP Port 1434
From: Wayne (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 03/30/04
- Next message: Peter Daniels: "Re: Multiple Data Files and paralell IO - yes or no"
- Previous message: HartA: "add new field"
- In reply to: Jasper Smith: "Re: Blocking UDP Port 1434"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:04:27 -0800
We are talking about thousands of clients and I am not
sure all applications support the use of aliases. Is there
an easy way out? Will the use of Proxy Server be a better
choice? Thanks for your input!
>-----Original Message-----
>No. You can use client aliases to enable clients to
resolve named instance
>network endpoints
>
>--
>HTH
>
>Jasper Smith (SQL Server MVP)
>
>I support PASS - the definitive, global
>community for SQL Server professionals -
>http://www.sqlpass.org
>
>
>"Wayne" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message
>news:15ca401c41699$7b2a65c0$a301280a@phx.gbl...
>> In order to protect from 'slammer' kind of virus, we are
>> planning to block UDP Port 1434 on all gateways. Named
>> instances seem to rely on UDP Port 1434. Since TCP port
>> the sql instance is listening on can be re-assigned, Can
>> we reassign the UDP port 1434 as well? Any input will be
>> appreciated. Thank you!
>>
>
>
>.
>
- Next message: Peter Daniels: "Re: Multiple Data Files and paralell IO - yes or no"
- Previous message: HartA: "add new field"
- In reply to: Jasper Smith: "Re: Blocking UDP Port 1434"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
