Re: DBCC CHECKDB Errors
From: Tibor Karaszi (tibor_please.no.email_karaszi_at_hotmail.nomail.com)
Date: 03/17/04
- Next message: Kalen Delaney: "Re: dbo can't bring DB online"
- Previous message: Tibor Karaszi: "Re: Backup Oddity"
- In reply to: Prasad Koukuntla: "DBCC CHECKDB Errors"
- Next in thread: Prasad Koukuntla: "Re: DBCC CHECKDB Errors"
- Reply: Prasad Koukuntla: "Re: DBCC CHECKDB Errors"
- Reply: Prasad Koukuntla: "Re: DBCC CHECKDB Errors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:49:05 +0100
Here's a start if you have corruption of a suspect database:
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/info_corrupt_suspect_db.asp
-- Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp "Prasad Koukuntla" <prasad.koukuntla@scapromo.com> wrote in message news:erelMZDDEHA.3784@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > Yesterday, we noticed that one of our RAID 5 drives failed. > > Then, I got the following errors when I ran the DBCC Checkdb on my database. > > Server: Msg 2533, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 > Table error: Page (1:199065) allocated to object ID 1006626629, index ID 0 > was not seen. Page may be invalid or have incorrect object ID information > in its header. > Server: Msg 2533, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 > Table error: Page (1:199066) allocated to object ID 1006626629, index ID 0 > was not seen. Page may be invalid or have incorrect object ID information > in its header. > Server: Msg 8976, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 > Table error: Object ID 1006626629, index ID 1. Page (1:199065) was not seen > in the scan although its parent (1:198489) and previous (1:199064) refer to > it. Check any previous errors. > Server: Msg 8980, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 > Table error: Object ID 1006626629, index ID 1. Index node page (1:198489), > slot 177 refers to child page (1:199066) and previous child (1:199065), but > they were not encountered. > Server: Msg 8978, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 > Table error: Object ID 1006626629, index ID 1. Page (1:199067) is missing a > reference from previous page (1:199066). Possible chain linkage problem. > CHECKDB found 0 allocation errors and 5 consistency errors in table > 'INT_AUX_LST_CUSTOM' (object ID 1006626629). > CHECKDB found 0 allocation errors and 5 consistency errors in database > 'sca_master'. > repair_allow_data_loss is the minimum repair level for the errors found by > DBCC CHECKDB (sca_master ). > > > I found nothing on error 2533. > I found the following on other errors and suggest that these errors were > correctd in service pack 1. However, I am already running SQL SERVER SP3, > with hotfix. > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;291566 > > I think the above errors occurred because of the drive failure. We replace > the failed drive but these errors are still coming up. > The server is still online and being used by the users. > > Questions: > If I run the DBCC CHECKDB with repair_allow_data_loss option, is there > any way of finding how much data is lost? > Is there any way to avoid no data loss? > > Thanks in advance. > > Prasad Koukuntla > > > > > >
- Next message: Kalen Delaney: "Re: dbo can't bring DB online"
- Previous message: Tibor Karaszi: "Re: Backup Oddity"
- In reply to: Prasad Koukuntla: "DBCC CHECKDB Errors"
- Next in thread: Prasad Koukuntla: "Re: DBCC CHECKDB Errors"
- Reply: Prasad Koukuntla: "Re: DBCC CHECKDB Errors"
- Reply: Prasad Koukuntla: "Re: DBCC CHECKDB Errors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|