Re: Can't see named instance
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:51:14 -0800
Yeah, thanks, that was it. Was getting burned by the user rights. The install is supposed to load version 2.7 but I don't think the user had enough rights on the box to do it.
Relevant Pages
- Re: In need of .NET advocacy
... * The resistance of people to install the .NET framework. ... believe what stories they come up in order not to install it. ... * At this moment installing the .NET framework is far too complicated. ... code so it does have access to the user rights. ...
(microsoft.public.dotnet.general) - Re: In need of .NET advocacy
... > believe what stories they come up in order not to install it. ... > program needs internet and/or LAN access. ... > code so it does have access to the user rights. ...
(microsoft.public.dotnet.general) - Re: Uninstalling Windows messenger
... >> Depends how you are running your network, but why not restrict their ... >> user rights so they can't install programs? ... Under a limited account the user cannot "always install ... I'm not a big fan of restricting user rights, but in the context of the ...
(microsoft.public.windowsxp.messenger) - Re: GPO Best Practice
... Peachtree can run in user rights? ... www.threatcode.com check out the tools on that site to wack registries ... Andre wrote: ... > 1- No One can install any softwares unless approved by the System Manager ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs) - RE: Symantec LiveUpdate and User Rights on Win2000
... You can add the users to the power users group. ... virus definitions. ... they are no longer able to install AV definitions through the LiveUpdate ... Trojan/virus has less of a chance of being initialized under user rights, ...
(Security-Basics) |
|
