RE: Transactional replication: Deadlock issue
- From: Paul Ibison <Paul.Ibison@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:50:00 -0700
If you just initialize the data betweek DB1 and DB2 without DB3 being
affected then won't there be non-convergence with DB3? If there are rows now
in DB2 and not in DB3 which the distribution agent updates, there will be an
error from the merge agent as it tries to apply the changes on the
subscriber. I'm assuming that there aren't relevant filters which will
prevent this.
I'm wondering whyt there are tables which are being republished in the merge
publication. Would it be possible to have the transactional publication
publish to DB3 and just have the merge publication apply to the remaining
tables.
We probably need to understand the topology and schemas a bit more to form a
proper set of advice.
Cheers,
Paul Ibison
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Transactional replication: Deadlock issue
- From: just.starting@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Transactional replication: Deadlock issue
- References:
- Transactional replication: Deadlock issue
- From: just.starting@xxxxxxxxx
- Transactional replication: Deadlock issue
- Prev by Date: Transactional replication: Deadlock issue
- Next by Date: RE: Account get locked out when restart the sql server agent
- Previous by thread: Transactional replication: Deadlock issue
- Next by thread: Re: Transactional replication: Deadlock issue
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|