Re: Merge replication and Domain Controller
- From: "Hilary Cotter" <hilary.cotter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:04:42 -0500
Dear Aimless Zombie
1) Can either pass through authentication or use sql authentication achieve
the role of a domain controller? Or is there no basis for comparison at all
in the first place?
No a domain controller is primarily used to authenticate users. You will not
be able to add local machine accounts to a domain controller, so you will
need to add domain accounts. You can still use pass through authentication
as long as the subscriber has a local machine account with the same name and
password. It is not recommended that you install SQL Server on a domain
controller as if SQL Server is compromised your entire domain will be.
3) What if I must have a domain controller (part of requirement) but yet
only one machine available? Is there no workaround to my constraint to have
both domain controller and replication?
You can install SQL Server on your domain controller but it is considered to
be a security risk.
I am not sure what you are doing, but I think you will make life simpler for
yourself if you use push subscriptions.
--
http://www.zetainteractive.com - Shift Happens!
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"AimlessZombie" <AimlessZombie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:76DC30CD-7E60-4EEC-8736-3661788DDCDC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Hilary,
Thanks for the prompt help. Just a couple more questions with respect to
your replies.
1) Can either pass through authentication or use sql authentication
achieve
the role of a domain controller? Or is there no basis for comparison at
all
in the first place?
3) What if I must have a domain controller (part of requirement) but yet
only one machine available? Is there no workaround to my constraint to
have
both domain controller and replication?
Thanks.
"Hilary Cotter" wrote:
Dear Aimless zombie.
1) No, you can use local machine accounts with pass through
authentication
or use sql authentication.
2) you can use either sql authentication or integrated authentication.
SQL
Authentication is intended for replicating between untrusted domains or
heterogeneous applications. Integrated authentication is more secure.
3) You don't need a domain controller.
--
http://www.zetainteractive.com - Shift Happens!
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"AimlessZombie" <AimlessZombie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message
news:09DB05F1-288D-4489-BFEF-2CB09FAF7E8B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
A few questions on merge replication and domain controller. We are
using
MS
SQL 2005 and Windows Server 2003.
1. Is domain controller a must for merge replication? Does performing
replication using Integrated Windows Authentication essentially has the
same
effect as with a domain controller?
2. If merge replication is to be done with a domain controller, which
method
of authentication, SQL Server Authentication or Integrated Windows
Authentication, can/should be used for replication? What are the
advantages
of one over the other, if any?
3. I understand that MS does not recommend running SQL Server 2005 on a
domain controller. Having said that, this would mean we need to
separate
the
two. But we have the constraint of having only one machine. Is there
any
workaround for this, that is, performing merge replication and
achieving
the
function of a domain controller but with only one machine?
My apologies if I am not making sense as I am not too familiar with
these.
Would appreciate any help on this. Thanks in advance.
.
- References:
- Re: Merge replication and Domain Controller
- From: Hilary Cotter
- Re: Merge replication and Domain Controller
- From: AimlessZombie
- Re: Merge replication and Domain Controller
- Prev by Date: Re: replicated commands not executed on the subscriber side?
- Next by Date: Date/time when put on distributor
- Previous by thread: Re: Merge replication and Domain Controller
- Next by thread: Re: How not to replicate update statement
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|