Re: General SQL Server 2005 transactional replication question
- From: "Paul Ibison" <Paul.Ibison@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:08:21 -0000
In that case I'd go for log shipping. Once the primary server is back up and
going, you could restore the database from the standby server or use
DataCompare to sync up the databases. Higher latency than replication but it
looks like you have little choice. SQL Server 2005 will offer mirroring
which you can use as a lower latency version of log shipping.
Cheers,
Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com
.
- References:
- Re: General SQL Server 2005 transactional replication question
- From: Hilary Cotter
- Re: General SQL Server 2005 transactional replication question
- From: Kev
- Re: General SQL Server 2005 transactional replication question
- From: Hilary Cotter
- Re: General SQL Server 2005 transactional replication question
- From: Kev
- Re: General SQL Server 2005 transactional replication question
- Prev by Date: Re: Replication Setup Issues
- Next by Date: Re: SQL Server 2005 Trans Repl to Subscriber w/diff column names
- Previous by thread: Re: General SQL Server 2005 transactional replication question
- Next by thread: Replicated database restored to non replicated version
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|