Re: Replicating twice
- From: "Hilary Cotter" <hilary.cotter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:47:54 -0500
It should work. How is your global priority configured? You might want to
check the conflict viewer to see if these conflicts are logged.
--
Hilary Cotter
Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
positions, strategies or opinions.
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"JC" <jbzcooper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1141343267.632060.296050@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have a question that google seems eerily quite on. I'm running SQL
2005 and am replicating (merge via the web) from an intermediate box
which is also running 05. The intermediate box is replicating in some
fashion (unsure since it isn't under my control) from a SQL 2K box.
My issue is that when the job executes it says "Merge completed with no
data changes processed." even though the intermediate box has updated
data on it. Is this common? Is the answer so obvious that everyone is
laughing at me now?
Thanks :)
Jeremiah
.
- References:
- Replicating twice
- From: JC
- Replicating twice
- Prev by Date: Re: Merge Control Synchronization Problem
- Next by Date: Re: distribution database having problems???
- Previous by thread: Replicating twice
- Next by thread: Re: Replicating twice
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
