Re: Problem in merge replication with one direction
- From: "Hilary Cotter" <hilary.cotter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:31:37 -0500
It sounds like a row is present in the tables published for merge
replication which is missing replication tracking metadata. For an insert it
is easy to understand how this row could be present (non logged operations).
For an update it is more difficult to see how such tracking metadata could
be missing. Disabling replication triggers is one of the reasons which can
cause this. In your scenario I can't think of anything obvious.
--
Hilary Cotter
Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
positions, strategies or opinions.
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"umesh" <umesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5E54715C-4EE4-4D7A-B5C0-E1AF17BD1213@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello Hilary
Thank you very much for the reply.
In my replication scenario, I am creating all the setup (database
creation,
publications, subscription, everything) through scripts. After doing this,
the replication seems to work fine, by checking the values in both
Publisher
and subscriber. But after some time, with out making any change in
replication settings, it seems that replication fails and the conflict
viewer
shows the error message as I posted earlier.
Also in another dicussion I found the same problem mentioned by another
person and there it was asked to check whether any DTS action is going on.
As
in our development enviornment some person might have tried for this or
done
some thing related to DTS. Could you please tell me how can I check or
conclude that the replication problem is because of DTS. Or any other
method ?
Thank you
Umesh
"Hilary Cotter" wrote:
Did you disable any of the merge replication triggers?IIRC this will
cause
this error.
--
Hilary Cotter
Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
positions, strategies or opinions.
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"umesh" <umesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43AD8F20-A649-4539-927C-20F0FB379AC5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi
The actual error message is "The row was updated at 'publihser' but
could
not be updated at 'subscriber'. Unable to synchronize the row because
the
row
was updated by a different process outside of replication."
Thanks in advance
Umesh
"umesh" wrote:
Hi,
I have a database with SQL Server 2000 and many MSDE. I need to
replicate
all MSDE database to the central Server, which is SQL Server 2000.
Also I
dont need to replicate from central database to all other MSDE
database.
So
central database just acts as backup for all MSDE and also the
replication
should occur in 5 seconds, as some client applications are connected
to
this
Server database to show the values in all MSDE database. I cannot do
Transactional replication since using MSDE as database in all machines
excpet
the one used as Server.
Thus the topology is, Multiple publisher - Central Subscriber, with
one
direction (ExchangeType=2 , publisher to subscriber only) and
replication
interval as 5 seconds (PollingInterval 5).
Does this topology has any problem ?
The replication is working, but after some time, some tables dont
replicate
and the conflict message comes like 'Cannot update as some process
outside of
replication is accessing the row' .
Please comment on this...
Thanks in advance
Umesh
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Problem in merge replication with one direction
- From: Hilary Cotter
- Re: Problem in merge replication with one direction
- From: umesh
- Re: Problem in merge replication with one direction
- Prev by Date: Re: impact of polling interval
- Next by Date: Transactional replication from SQL Server 2005 to SQL Server 7 - how?
- Previous by thread: Re: Problem in merge replication with one direction
- Next by thread: Re: Problem in merge replication with one direction
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|