Re: Upgrade scenario



Thank you both for your quick replies. Your sugestions seam OK. I was hoping
that something similar could be done.
I will test that scenario in my test environment first and see how it
goes...


Thanks
Tom



"Michael Hotek" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eM4pz8oEGHA.1312@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> The archiecture you are describing is impossible. You can not use merge
> replication between SQL Server 7.0 and SQL Server 6.5. SQL Server 6.5
> also does not support transactional with immediate updating subscribers
> (only other updateable option in SQL Server 7.0).
>
> So, disregarding what you have listed as your current architecture, you
> can do the following process regardless of replication method you have
> deployed.
>
> 1. Install 1 new server with Windows 2003 and SQL Server 2005
> 2. Transfer all logins from the 7.0 server to the 2005 server
> 3. Recreate any SQL Agent jobs that should be setup on the 2005 server
> 4. Enable replication and set this machine up as a distributor.
> 5. Create a new merge subscription from SQL Server 7.0 to SQL Server 2005
> 6. Script out any objects, in 7.0 that did not get created on the 2005
> database
> 7. Create a new publication on SQL Server 2005 (distributor is what was
> set in step 4)
> 8. Drop the subscription to the first 6.5 database and recreate the
> subscription from the publication created in step 7
> 9. Repeat step 8 for each additional 6.5 subscriber
>
> You now have your existing 7.0 server publishing to SQL Server 2005
> through the 2005 distributor. You have moved all of your subscribers over
> to receiving their data from the new SQL Server 2005 server.
>
> 10. Drop the 7.0 publication and subscription.
>
> You now have 1 new server with Windows 2003 and SQL Server 2005 deployed
> as your publisher and distributor. Everything else is still sitting
> exactly as it was before. The interesting thing at this point, is that
> you incurred no dowtime on your applications and everything was
> transferred to the new SQL Server 2005 instance running on your new
> Windows 2003 Server. Now you just incrementally complete the process.
>
> 11. Deploy your second Windows 2003/SQL Server 2005 server, create a new
> subscription
> 12. Once you have verified that everything works correctly, eliminate one
> of the 6.5 subscribers and point any applications that were using it to
> the server deployed in step 11.
> 13. Repeat step 12 for each subscriber
>
> By doing this you get the following:
> 1. Incremental upgrade
> 2. Applications congtinue to run during the upgrade
> 3. Minimal, if any downtime
> 4. Complete replacement of 7.0 and 6.5 without carrying any legacy
> binaries
> 5. Multiple upgrades not required
>
> Now if you were not deploying new servers, then this process would be
> modified by upgrading the OS on all servers to Windows 2003 as the first
> step in the process. Instances of SQL Server 2005 would be installed
> side-by-side with the previous version. Everything else would remain the
> same.
>
> --
> Mike
> Mentor
> Solid Quality Learning
> http://www.solidqualitylearning.com
>
> "Tom" <mcseman2002@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:OAMPS9kEGHA.2012@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Current situation:
>> - 1 central location running SQL 7.0 acting as a publisher and
>> distributor in merge replication
>> - 30 remote locations running SQL 6.5 and acting as subscribers
>> - subscribers are pushing articles to central location twice a day
>>
>> We are planning to replace all servers with new ones running windows 2003
>> and SQL 2005.
>> There is no way we can replace all servers and migrate the databases over
>> night so we need a scenario where we can replace remote servers one by
>> one and to ensure that old and new remote locations can replicate with
>> central location at the same time....
>> any suggestions??? Thanks
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>
>


.



Relevant Pages

  • RE: My Documents Redirection error
    ... We can upgrade the instance SharePoint ... >> is no need to manually migrate data from MSDE to SQL server and all dada ... >> How to back up and restore http://companyweb data in Windows Small ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Upgrade from MSDE to SQL
    ... Hard to say whether the database is of any use to you now you are partway ... upgrade just in case. ... But FIRST I would in any case see if adding SQL Server ...
    (microsoft.public.sharepoint.windowsservices)
  • Re: SQL server 2000 Hardware
    ... SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition supports 2GB of RAM. ... more than that you will have to upgrade to SQL Server Enterprise. ... RAID volume for your database files, a separate RAID volume for the log ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.setup)
  • Re: WSS 2.0 to 3.0 - different servers
    ... Check the third upgrade option in the Microsoft documentation. ... So, No, to "if I can perform a gradual upgrade when WSS 2.0 is on one server and WSS 3.0 is on another." ... WSS 2.0 installed on Server A using Sql Server on Server S ...
    (microsoft.public.sharepoint.windowsservices)
  • Re: WSS Search Help
    ... I used SQL Server 2K SP3 for the initial upgrade and then upgraded it ... Selected "SQL Server 2000 Components" ... Selected "Install Database Server", ...
    (microsoft.public.sharepoint.windowsservices)