Re: Peer to peer replication on SQL 2000?
- From: AL <albeNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 17:11:56 +0100
Mike,
It absolutely can not be done. You wind up with endlessly looping transactions.
unfortunately this kind of solution is the one I'd want to deliver, not having SQL 2005 ;(
What would you suggest me to do with SQL 2000? I have 3 servers, and want to let all of them be both publishers and subscribers, so that any modification done on any of the three servers replicates to the others.
I initially thought at merge replication, then I liked the suggestion about bi-directional replication... could I use merge replication and design a circular topology? Or should I use a mix - you tell you're using both transactional and merge repl. types - ?
Thanks for any help, al. .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Peer to peer replication on SQL 2000?
- From: Michael Hotek
- Re: Peer to peer replication on SQL 2000?
- References:
- Peer to peer replication on SQL 2000?
- From: AL
- Re: Peer to peer replication on SQL 2000?
- From: Michael Hotek
- Peer to peer replication on SQL 2000?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is SQL2005 Database Mirroring ready?
- Next by Date: Re: Peer to peer replication on SQL 2000?
- Previous by thread: Re: Peer to peer replication on SQL 2000?
- Next by thread: Re: Peer to peer replication on SQL 2000?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|