Re: merge relication and stored procedure changes aren't updated at subscribers
Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance
No - that should be fine. If this is just for stored procs, you might want
to make the second one a snapshot to avoid any unnecessary metadata
overhead.
Cheers,
Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com
(recommended sql server 2000 replication book:
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602p.html)
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: pull subscription - anynonomous - error HELP
... Did you configure your pull subscription to download the snapshot using ftp? ... Looking for a SQL Server replication book? ...
(microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication) - Re: Merge Replication "after the fact" ...
... You can use the snapshot from C to A and B if you want instead of DTS. ... There are still rows being augmented and SQL Server ... replaces what exists on the subscriber. ... Create a publication and the subscriptions to/from A and B ...
(microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication) - Re: install/configure SQL Server 2000, SQL Server CE for merge rep
... I was wondering what the significance is to sharing the snapshot folder. ... Does the Pocket PC directly access the shared folder? ... >> check the replication monitor in SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Manager ...
(microsoft.public.sqlserver.ce) - Re: How do I prevent initial Snapshot to drop my tables?!
... Looking for a SQL Server replication book? ... > There you can specify in the "Snapshot" tab, ... > going to drop and re-create the target tables, ... all the commands to manipulate the schema at the subscriber ...
(microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication) - Re: Replication Errors running SQL Server 2005 beta
... >> I should have an initial publication. ... >> sure the snapshot was created. ... The Snapshot Agent will run under the Administrator account. ... >> running SQL Server, ...
(microsoft.public.sqlserver.ce) |
|
