Re: SQL SERVER 2005 REPLICATION

Steffi,
this is a big question :) In BOL you'll see a list of the new replication
functionality, so it really depends on whether you'll need to take advantage
of it. IMHO it'd be best to wait for SQL 2005 because even the base
functionality is improced - trace tokens, unidirectional merge is improved
etc.
Cheers,
Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com
(recommended sql server 2000 replication book:
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602p.html)


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Indexed Views
    ... >> wrong or the functionality was added with the SP's) ... The BOL information was wrong in the RTM version. ... SQL Server Documentation Team ... > "Tom Moreau" wrote in message ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.server)
  • Re: Indexed Views
    ... wrong or the functionality was added with the SP's) ... >I got this from my BOL: ... >Columnist, SQL Server Professional ... >> Toronto, ON Canada ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.server)
  • Do replication for a non-Administrators
    ... Have a look at replication,security - role requirements ... perform replication, and they are 2 different things. ... and these details are in BOL. ... Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication)
  • RE: replication and upgrade of SQL7 to SQL2000
    ... SQL Server 2000 builds upon SQL 7 replication. ... It offers enhanced performance and greater functionality as well as new functionality. ... Check out replication enhancements in BOL for more details. ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication)
  • Questions to be asked when recruiting replication specialist??
    ... You could gen up on replication using BOL, ... Administration exam. ... Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication)