Re: Replication and secure off-site servers
- From: "Paul Ibison" <Paul.Ibison@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:55:05 +0100
Michael,
some people have used transactional replication for this purposes. To keep
the 2 systems entirely in sync will require careful planning though, as not
all objects can be replicated - eg permissions, users and indexes, and by
default you'll lose identity attributes. Certainly I can see queued updating
subscribers being used in this way, which avoids the issues of not having
the identity columns, but it still leaves the matter of the other objects
being manually synchronized. Log shipping on the other hand will take all
the extra objects. In theory the log could be shipped once a minute but in
my experience you'll be pushing it to get a very low latency. I suspect this
might be the best option for your case.
Cheers,
Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com
(recommended sql server 2000 replication book:
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602p.html)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Replication and secure off-site servers
- From: Michael MacGregor
- Re: Replication and secure off-site servers
- References:
- Replication and secure off-site servers
- From: Michael MacGregor
- Replication and secure off-site servers
- Prev by Date: Conflict resolver issue
- Next by Date: Re: MERGE Replication - OLD Data Comes back
- Previous by thread: Replication and secure off-site servers
- Next by thread: Re: Replication and secure off-site servers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading