Re: Replication and secure off-site servers
- From: "Michael MacGregor" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:53:49 -0400
How does that work when there is a firewall between the Production server
and the hot-copy?
"Paul Ibison" <Paul.Ibison@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ekPb3DboFHA.3316@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Michael,
> some people have used transactional replication for this purposes. To keep
> the 2 systems entirely in sync will require careful planning though, as
not
> all objects can be replicated - eg permissions, users and indexes, and by
> default you'll lose identity attributes. Certainly I can see queued
updating
> subscribers being used in this way, which avoids the issues of not having
> the identity columns, but it still leaves the matter of the other objects
> being manually synchronized. Log shipping on the other hand will take all
> the extra objects. In theory the log could be shipped once a minute but in
> my experience you'll be pushing it to get a very low latency. I suspect
this
> might be the best option for your case.
> Cheers,
> Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com
> (recommended sql server 2000 replication book:
> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602p.html)
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Replication and secure off-site servers
- From: Peter Yang [MSFT]
- Re: Replication and secure off-site servers
- References:
- Replication and secure off-site servers
- From: Michael MacGregor
- Re: Replication and secure off-site servers
- From: Paul Ibison
- Replication and secure off-site servers
- Prev by Date: Re: MERGE Replication - OLD Data Comes back
- Next by Date: very strange error on transactional replication
- Previous by thread: Re: Replication and secure off-site servers
- Next by thread: Re: Replication and secure off-site servers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading