Re: Merge Replication Filter does not work at Subscriber
- From: "Paul Ibison" <Paul.Ibison@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:41:15 +0100
Vikas,
you could use an instead-of trigger for this, and divert these rows to
another table.
Alternatively you could use partitioned tables (like federated database
servers but all on one database).
Another alternative is to edit the merge triggers to not record these rows
in the metadata tables.
Rgds,
Paul Ibison
"Vikas Kohli" <VikasKohli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ACFC59F9-7CE5-4869-83D3-7CB836E6E273@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I am setting up a SQL Server Database Filter based Merge Replication
>between
> Publisher (on Server Global) & Subscriber (on Server Site) using
> EXCHANGE_TYPE '1' (Data only needs to be merged from Subscriber(Site) to
> Publisher(Global) - Upload). You can consider this as a Central Subscriber
> model with multiple Publications based on Filter "Siteid" push Data to
> Central Subscriber Global. I have created all the Publications in the
> Central
> Publisher Database Global (Normally central subscriber model will have
> Publications on each site but I did wanted to do that due to Maintenance &
> security issues )
>
> Also I have set up conflict resolver "SQL Server Subscriber always wins
> the
> conflict" since I want my Subscriber changes to override changes done at
> Publisher.
>
> However, I am facing this issue:
>
> Even if I add a row at subscriber Site that is not part of Filter (it goes
> into the Publisher Global). I do not want the rows other than filter
> clause
> to replicate to Central Hub.
>
> Any assistance is highly appreciated!
>
> Database : SQL Server 2000 SP3a
> OS: Win2003 (No Service Pack)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Merge Replication Filter does not work at Subscriber
- From: Vikas Kohli
- Re: Merge Replication Filter does not work at Subscriber
- References:
- Merge Replication Filter does not work at Subscriber
- From: Vikas Kohli
- Merge Replication Filter does not work at Subscriber
- Prev by Date: Licensing for Cnetral Subscriber
- Next by Date: Re: Differential SQL backups ? is this possible?
- Previous by thread: Merge Replication Filter does not work at Subscriber
- Next by thread: Re: Merge Replication Filter does not work at Subscriber
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|