Re: Snapshot only with scheme
- From: "Paul Ibison" <Paul.Ibison@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:03:09 +0100
Mario,
why can't you just add the article at the publisher? Run the snapshot agent
and only the new article will be generated.
As for the large amount of data that has accumulated on the publisher - this
will be in the form of commands in the distribution database waiting to be
replicated. They'll come over first before the new article. If your
transaction retention period has not been set appropriately (and history
retention period) then the commands will be deleted before synchronization,
which is possibly why you are having to reinitialize. If the subscribers
don't require this data, as you mention, then I don't understand how this is
viable - why use replication at all? Perhaps there is a business reason for
this that I'm missing, and if this is the case, then I'd add the articles to
a new publication and use that with an independant distribution agent and
initialize the new articles that way.
Rgds,
Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com
(recommended sql server 2000 replication book:
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602p.html)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Snapshot only with scheme
- From: Mario Barro
- Re: Snapshot only with scheme
- References:
- Snapshot only with scheme
- From: Mario Barro
- Re: Snapshot only with scheme
- From: Paul Ibison
- Re: Snapshot only with scheme
- From: Mario Barro
- Snapshot only with scheme
- Prev by Date: Re: Snapshot only with scheme
- Next by Date: Re: Automatic Range Management - is no longer working.
- Previous by thread: Re: Snapshot only with scheme
- Next by thread: Re: Snapshot only with scheme
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading