Re: Transactional Replication
From: Kyle Jedrusiak (kjedrusiak_at_princetoninformation.com)
Date: 03/01/05
- Next message: J Jetson: "Re: snapshots with merge replication"
- Previous message: ishaan99 via SQLMonster.com: "Re: Identity error in replication"
- In reply to: Paul Ibison: "Re: Transactional Replication"
- Next in thread: Paul Ibison: "Re: Transactional Replication"
- Reply: Paul Ibison: "Re: Transactional Replication"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:21:09 -0500
I've read several of the pages on your website and it's still not completely
clear.
Here is the full scenario which is probably typical...
We have an accounting database. We didn't develop it and we have no control
over the schema (including view, SPs, etc)
We would like to be able to (manually) fail over to a server in a different
city in a reasonable amount of time while (of course) losing little or no
data.
Once we have whatever it is set up there should be little to do unless we DO
need to fail over. Could or would it be as simple as pointing to a server
with a different ip address.
Kyle!
"Paul Ibison" <Paul.Ibison@Pygmalion.Com> wrote in message
news:Ow8K8dpHFHA.576@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Kyle,
> transactional replication and log shipping have both been used for this
> sort of thing. Log shipping is usually the more appropriate, but have a
> look here for a high-level comparison:
> http://www.replicationanswers.com/Standby.htm
> Rgds,
> Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com
> (recommended sql server 2000 replication book:
> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602p.html)
>
- Next message: J Jetson: "Re: snapshots with merge replication"
- Previous message: ishaan99 via SQLMonster.com: "Re: Identity error in replication"
- In reply to: Paul Ibison: "Re: Transactional Replication"
- Next in thread: Paul Ibison: "Re: Transactional Replication"
- Reply: Paul Ibison: "Re: Transactional Replication"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|