Re: Merge replication issue
From: Cmoss (Cmoss_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 08/11/04
- Next message: ChrisR: "Re: Custom Sync Objects"
- Previous message: Paul Ibison: "Re: DBCC DBREINDEX and Transactional Replication"
- In reply to: Paul Ibison: "Re: Merge replication issue"
- Next in thread: Paul Ibison: "Re: Merge replication issue"
- Reply: Paul Ibison: "Re: Merge replication issue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:17:05 -0700
Paul,
Thanks for the response. I do have filters on the articles, but the data
that is being removed is from the same tables that data was successfully
synchronized from before. I have changed the conflict type on some of my
crucial articles to be "subscriber always wins" becuase that is where the
data originates from. It is my understanding that I can change this
parameter at any time, correct?
"Paul Ibison" wrote:
> Cmoss,
>
> do you have filters? If the rows aren't allowed through the filter clause,
> this could explain why records added at the subscriber are removed on
> synchronization.
>
> The default resolver is publisher always wins, and if 2 subscribers
> conflict, the first attains the priority of the publisher.
>
> HTH,
>
> Paul Ibison
>
>
>
- Next message: ChrisR: "Re: Custom Sync Objects"
- Previous message: Paul Ibison: "Re: DBCC DBREINDEX and Transactional Replication"
- In reply to: Paul Ibison: "Re: Merge replication issue"
- Next in thread: Paul Ibison: "Re: Merge replication issue"
- Reply: Paul Ibison: "Re: Merge replication issue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|