Re: Use Replication or Not
From: Paul Ibison (Paul.Ibison_at_Pygmalion.Com)
Date: 07/21/04
- Next message: Paul Ibison: "Archiving data"
- Previous message: Paul Ibison: "Re: Solutions to merge replication problem"
- In reply to: Armaghan: "Re: Use Replication or Not"
- Next in thread: Armaghan: "Re: Use Replication or Not"
- Reply: Armaghan: "Re: Use Replication or Not"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:16:03 -0700
In theory this is possible using DTS but could end up
being extremely complicated, as essentially you are
recreating merge replication. Complications arising from
this scenario are:
Deletes can't be flagged, so they'd have to go into an
audit table.
Updates could conflict with other updates.
Someone could update a record on the publisher while a
subscriber deletes the same record - another type of
conflict.
Once this lot is sorted out, you'd have to translate the
change accepted into your custom table and apply it into
the real table, assuming this scenario applies to modified
schemas as before.
Regards,
Paul Ibison
- Next message: Paul Ibison: "Archiving data"
- Previous message: Paul Ibison: "Re: Solutions to merge replication problem"
- In reply to: Armaghan: "Re: Use Replication or Not"
- Next in thread: Armaghan: "Re: Use Replication or Not"
- Reply: Armaghan: "Re: Use Replication or Not"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|