Re: SQL Server Replication - Keywords as fieldnames
From: andy (ag-cbg_at_gmx.net)
Date: 04/21/04
- Next message: Paul Ibison: "Re: SQL Server Replication - Keywords as fieldnames"
- Previous message: Hector: "How to encrypt communication between servers when merge"
- In reply to: Paul Ibison: "Re: SQL Server Replication - Keywords as fieldnames"
- Next in thread: Paul Ibison: "Re: SQL Server Replication - Keywords as fieldnames"
- Reply: Paul Ibison: "Re: SQL Server Replication - Keywords as fieldnames"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 21 Apr 2004 05:09:13 -0700
"Paul Ibison" <Paul.Ibison@Pygmalion.Com> wrote in message news:<uWwB6UgJEHA.2376@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>...
> Andy,
> just tested this here and it's ok. I think this is likely to be a service
> pack issue and the message is a generic one, with 'Key' being a bit of a red
> herring. Are you on sp3(a)? If you are on SP3, please post me your
> schema+publication and I'll look at it. If you are on sp3 and are using
> queued updating subscribers then there is a fix available
> http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=294970.
> HTH,
> Paul Ibison
Hi Paul,
thx a lot for your support!
I'm using
SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.859 (Intel X86)
Build 3790:
which means SP3+Q821334 (says sqlsecurity.com)
I don't use queued updating subscribers but nevertheless get the
error.
Can you please tell me what exactly I should post that you can have a
look at it? (is there an export function for this in EM, or just the
generated sql Script?)
andy
- Next message: Paul Ibison: "Re: SQL Server Replication - Keywords as fieldnames"
- Previous message: Hector: "How to encrypt communication between servers when merge"
- In reply to: Paul Ibison: "Re: SQL Server Replication - Keywords as fieldnames"
- Next in thread: Paul Ibison: "Re: SQL Server Replication - Keywords as fieldnames"
- Reply: Paul Ibison: "Re: SQL Server Replication - Keywords as fieldnames"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|