Re: SQL Load Balancing
From: RS (rspen_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/05/04
- Next message: RS: "Re: SQL Load Balancing"
- Previous message: RS: "Re: Merge agent suspect but runs fine"
- In reply to: Duke: "SQL Load Balancing"
- Next in thread: RS: "Re: SQL Load Balancing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 08:53:51 -0600
Paul may correct me if I am wrong, but I don't think you can truly load
balance a SQL server on a cluster. The reason being is that each engine
must maintain complete control over the database files. You can however,
use replication to move data to another server for reporting purposes, and
that should remove a lot of the load off of the OLTP server. That is a
pseudo load balance.
Thanks,
RS
"Duke" <dburrell@fbfs.com> wrote in message
news:77fd01c402ba$2fecfed0$a501280a@phx.gbl...
> We are currently using SQL 2000 in an Active/Passive
> clustering mode and would like to explore the
> possibilities of load-balancing access to the database.
> Is Microsoft replication services within SQL adaquate
> maintaining the databases on the load-balanced nodes?
> has anyone had any experience with this scenerio?
>
> Thanks
> Duke
>
- Next message: RS: "Re: SQL Load Balancing"
- Previous message: RS: "Re: Merge agent suspect but runs fine"
- In reply to: Duke: "SQL Load Balancing"
- Next in thread: RS: "Re: SQL Load Balancing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|