Re: Conditionally Adding SQL
- From: "Russell Fields" <russellfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:04:51 -0400
Linchi,
I just went through and read a few of Joe's posts, so perhaps you are correct in his outlook.
SQL = (DDL, DML)
Everything else is not SQL, just proprietary stuff that should be done in some other language anyway. (Aside from the fact that the DDL and DML may not always measure up to the pure language of SQL.)
RLF
"Linchi Shea" <LinchiShea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:C713C5EC-06AA-4849-AA41-F2C53901A1B9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Original post aside, I have to agree with Joe here. After all, he said SQL,
not T-SQL. As to how far you cna get in real world solving real problem with
just SQL and without any control flow is quite another matter.
Linchi
"Aaron Bertrand [SQL Server MVP]" wrote:
> There is no need for local variales and flags in SQL.
What an absurd declaration!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Conditionally Adding SQL
- From: --CELKO--
- Re: Conditionally Adding SQL
- From: Aaron Bertrand [SQL Server MVP]
- Re: Conditionally Adding SQL
- References:
- Conditionally Adding SQL
- From: Jason R. Soby
- Re: Conditionally Adding SQL
- From: Aaron Bertrand [SQL Server MVP]
- Re: Conditionally Adding SQL
- From: Jason R. Soby
- Re: Conditionally Adding SQL
- From: --CELKO--
- Re: Conditionally Adding SQL
- From: Aaron Bertrand [SQL Server MVP]
- Re: Conditionally Adding SQL
- From: Linchi Shea
- Conditionally Adding SQL
- Prev by Date: Re: Conditionally Adding SQL
- Next by Date: Re: Conditionally Adding SQL
- Previous by thread: Re: Conditionally Adding SQL
- Next by thread: Re: Conditionally Adding SQL
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|